Visible hands
  
  The Economist | Feb 1, 2005
  http://www.economist.com/agenda/displaystory.cfm?story_id=3620794

Three of the most important prices in the world economy are set by 
means other than markets. At the weekend, OPEC declared itself happy 
with the price of oil. On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve will 
probably raise American interest rates. And on Friday, the G7 will 
declare itself unhappy with the price of the dollar
 

PRICES, when freely set, bring order and concord to the unplanned 
activities of market economies�as if by an invisible hand. But three 
of the most important prices in the world economy�the price of oil, 
the price of capital and the price of the dollar�are nudged this way 
or that by the very visible hands of the Organisation of the 
Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), the Federal Reserve and the 
G7. OPEC, the oil producers' cartel, met at the weekend in Vienna; 
the Fed, America's central bank, meets on Wednesday February 2nd; 
and finance ministers and central bankers from the G7, the group of 
seven rich nations, congregate towards the end of the week in 
London, where they will be joined by their counterparts from China 
and India. 

Thanks to China's hot economy and America's cold weather, demand for 
oil has strengthened over the past month. Thus the rise in the oil 
price�from $40.25 for a barrel of West Texas Intermediate in early 
December to over $48 on the eve of OPEC's meeting�would receive Adam 
Smith's blessing: it is the invisible hand at work. But when strong 
demand drives prices up, high prices are supposed, in turn, to 
stimulate supply. OPEC, by contrast, is determined to stop oil 
flowing any faster than it is already. 

On Sunday, the cartel refused to lift the quota of 27m barrels per 
day (bpd) that it imposed on its members (with the exception of 
Iraq) in December. Indeed, it insisted that its members, who are 
pumping about 500,000 bpd in excess of their quotas, stick to their 
limits more conscientiously. OPEC also abandoned the target range of 
prices�$22 to $28 per barrel for a basket of its crudes�that it set 
for itself in March 2000. The cartel has not hit that target for 14 
months. 

OPEC maintains that oil prices above $40 or even $50 do not hurt the 
world economy. As evidence, it points to the fact that last year, 
oil prices rose by 30% (peaking at over $55 in October) and the 
world economy grew by about 5%. High oil prices are not inimical to 
world economic growth, the cartel says; they are a natural 
consequence of it. 

But, of course, the world economy might have grown still faster if 
oil prices had not risen as sharply. Oxford Economic Forecasting 
reckons that the price of Brent crude will fall to $41 at the end of 
the year. But if the price remains instead at $50, it will wipe 0.5 
percentage points off GDP growth in America, 0.3 points off that of 
the euro area, and 0.4 points off growth in Japan, reckons Dresdner 
Kleinwort Wasserstein. 

OPEC's complacency depends in part on the Federal Reserve's 
credibility. Despite the rise in energy prices, the public is still 
convinced the Fed has inflation under control. Oil producers can 
thus enjoy higher prices without fearing the kind of damaging 
inflationary spiral that afflicted the global economy in the 1970s. 
Even though energy prices rose by 10.4% at an annualised rate in the 
last quarter of 2004, core consumer prices, which exclude energy and 
food, rose by just 2%.

According to the Department of Commerce, the American economy slowed 
in the last quarter, expanding by 3.1% at an annual rate. Surging 
imports and faltering exports cost it 1.7 percentage points of 
growth. But the Department now says that exports did not falter 
quite so badly as it first thought. Canada failed to count about $1 
billion-worth of goods and services it bought from its giant 
neighbour. Thus America's fourth-quarter performance may look 
somewhat better when revised figures are released on February 25th.

Whatever the doubts about Canada, American demand still looks 
strong. Consumption rose by 4.6% at an annual pace in the fourth 
quarter and investment by businesses grew by 10.3%. The Fed has 
slowly tightened its grip on the price of money, raising rates by 
1.25 percentage points since June. It is expected to raise them 
another quarter point on Wednesday. But its moves to date have been 
too light-handed to have much visible impact on the wider cost of 
borrowing. The yield on American Treasury bonds is a mere 4.1% or 
thereabouts. 

Treasuries are pricey because anyone who wants to buy one must 
compete with China's central bank. The People's Bank of China (PBoC) 
is, in effect, a "forced buyer" of Treasuries. To keep the yuan 
pegged at 8.28 to the dollar, it must buy as many dollars as people 
want to sell at that rate. Despite the controls it maintains on 
capital inflows, dollars are flooding in. In the last quarter of 
2004, the PBoC added another $100 billion to its foreign-exchange 
reserves. It stores the bulk of these reserves in the official 
liabilities of America's government. 

John Snow, the secretary of America's Treasury, will meet his 
biggest customer during the G7's meeting on Friday and Saturday. He 
and his European colleagues will put pressure on the Chinese to let 
their currency appreciate. Only if the yuan strengthens, they argue, 
will America's record trade deficit begin to narrow. 

But a revaluation of the yuan might have little immediate impact on 
America's trade flows. China accounts for less than a tenth of 
America's trade. If the Chinese were to revalue the yuan by 10% it 
would reduce the dollar's trade-weighted value by only 1%. Even if 
China's Asian rivals and partners followed its lead, revaluing their 
own currencies by a similar amount, the dollar's trade-weighted 
value would fall by only 3.7%. 

According to Brad Setser, a former Treasury official now at the 
University of Oxford, a dearer yuan would have a more significant 
effect on capital flows. At the moment, foreign capital is finding 
its way into China in anticipation of a yuan revaluation. 
Speculators want to be holding Chinese assets when the currency in 
which they are denominated jumps in value. The PBoC soaks up this 
foreign money and recycles large portions of it back into American 
Treasuries. Once the long-anticipated revaluation actually occurs, 
the speculation will ebb, and the PBoC will find itself with less 
money to throw at American assets. As a result, the price of those 
assets will fall and American interest rates will rise, encouraging 
Americans to live within their means. 

Mr Snow, like Adam Smith, may prefer it if prices, including the 
price of the dollar, are set by the invisible hand of the market. 
But at the moment, the dollar's value rests in the hands of the 
Chinese. And they seem determined to sit on them.









------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Has someone you know been affected by illness or disease?
Network for Good is THE place to support health awareness efforts!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/RzSHvD/UOnJAA/79vVAA/NJYolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

��������������������������������������������������������
This is ZESTEconomics. Post economics-related articles and event info to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTEconomics by sending a 
blank mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, visit 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/join

==theZESTcommunity======================================

[1] ZESTCurrent: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCurrent/
[2] ZESTEconomics: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/
[3] ZESTGlobal: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/
[4] ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/
[5] ZESTPoets: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTPoets/
[6] ZESTCaste: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/
[7] ZESTAlternative: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTAlternative/
[8] TalkZEST: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TalkZEST/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to