The future of the dollar 
   
  Nitin Desai
  Business Standard | February 16, 2005 
  http://www.business-standard.com/common/storypage.php?
hpFlag==Y&chklogin==N&autono=0941&leftnm==lmnu5&lselect==0&leftindx==5

What Alan Greenspan wants may worsen the global economic imbalance 
 

On February 4, Alan Greenspan made a major speech in which he 
signalled clearly that the Fed believes in a weakening dollar and 
higher US interest rates as the key to rebalancing the US economy.  
  
It was a thoughtful speech that accepted the US responsibility for 
the macro rebalancing between the mega economies of the US, Europe, 
Japan, and China, but also challenges the others to respond.  
  
On the same day, an ICRIER seminar contributed its rupee worth of 
wisdom.  
  
The general consensus was that the dollar, sterling, euro, and yen 
would continue to hover around their current levels relative to each 
other, and that the main readjustment would have to be a substantial 
appreciation of the Chinese yuan.  
  
As for the rupee, the expectation is that the RBI would counteract 
the upward pressure exerted by the huge inflows of portfolio 
capital.  
  
US interest rates will go up perhaps by about 50�75 basis points on 
the current 2.5 per cent level. But these guesses are probably of 
lesser importance than what the head of the Fed thinks!  
  
So much for the astrology. But what are the underlying planetary 
dynamics?  
  
Since 1995, there has been a persistent disequilibrium in current 
accounts�a large US deficit and equally large surpluses elsewhere, 
particularly in Asia.  
  
Until the mid-nineties, market forces, assisted by some policy 
measures, ensured that even large current account imbalances were 
corrected in good time and with limited disruption. These 
traditional mechanisms do not seem to work.  
  
One reason advanced by Greenspan is that the growth of the Internet 
and electronic transactions has made the holding of foreign assets 
look "less exotic and less risky" by reducing transaction costs and 
ensuring readily available information.  
  
But a large part of the accumulation of foreign assets is by Asian 
central banks, and that surely is not the result of changing asset 
preferences but a deliberate policy stance of protecting domestic 
growth.  
  
The current account imbalances have to be corrected. The US current 
account deficit is expected to respond to the weakening dollar and 
rising interest rates, helped by some renewed attention to lowering 
the fiscal deficit.  
  
Greenspan argues that "the increased flexibility of the American 
economy will likely facilitate any adjustment without significant 
consequences to aggregate economic activity."  
  
The main snag in this argument is the high volume of consumer and 
mortgage debt in the US. This is the reason for the collapse of 
household savings in the US, which are now just about 1 per cent of 
income.  
  
Higher interest rates could burst a few asset bubbles and also 
reduce consumer spending much more than anticipated as the sense of 
wealth generated by property price appreciation evaporates.  
  
What if the slowdown in consumer spending leads to US growth falling 
to, say, 1 per cent? What will be the implications of this for the 
Asian economies, which depend so heavily on the US market? Will they 
not be tempted to put off their exchange rate adjustment?  
  
A weakening dollar also means a rising euro. But can Europe really 
sustain this appreciation? For the past couple of years, as the euro 
has appreciated, European exporters have coped by reducing their 
margins.  
  
Thus, their dollar export prices increased by less than 10 per cent 
while the dollar depreciated by over 30 per cent in this period. 
They cannot keep reducing margins and a reduction in European 
exports to the US is unavoidable.  
  
As it is, Europe faces high unemployment and low growth. An 
appreciating euro and higher interest rates will not help matters. 
Even the casual observation of visitors to Europe and the US 
suggests that the current exchange rate is out of line with 
purchasing power parity. The adjustment that Greenspan seeks may 
actually worsen the underlying global imbalance.  
  
The situation in Japan is not much better. They too face a 
stagnating economy and can hardly afford a further appreciation in 
the yen. Yes, they are accumulating reserves.  
  
But past evidence does not suggest that a higher yen will reduce 
their surplus sufficiently to stop this. The belief that a rising 
exchange rate stimulates structural reforms has not been borne out.  
  
That leaves China, the one country that is growing rapidly, 
accumulating reserves, and not appreciating against the dollar. An 
adjustment in the yuan exchange rate will have to be large, and this 
may not happen through the normal processes of gradual market- 
induced change.  
  
A negotiated agreement may be required. But any such exchange rate 
agreement would have to cover much more than that. How easy will it 
be to secure such a broad-based macroeconomic accord? Will China 
cave in as easily as Japan did in the original 1985 Plaza Accord? 
Or, will the new accord do to China what the earlier one did to 
Japan, which is to choke off growth drastically?  
  
In short, it may be difficult to secure a soft landing with exchange 
rates realigned and macro policies readjusted so that growth 
momentum is maintained in the US, reduced in China, and enhanced in 
Europe and Japan.  
  
This pessimistic outlook led to two important questions being asked 
at the ICRIER seminar. First, do we face the risk of a speculator-
led sudden assault on the dollar or the yuan that could precipitate 
a crisis? Second, what is the long-term future of the dollar as the 
preferred reserve and trading currency?  
  
The risks of a speculative crisis are never zero in any market that 
depends so much on expectations. But the situation is not quite what 
it was when Soros mounted his famous 1992 raid on the pound.  
  
The dollar is more widely held and the resources available to fight 
off a bear run are substantial. In any case, the real problem for 
the dollar is whether market factors and policy responses will allow 
it to depreciate as much as US authorities would want.  
  
As for the yuan, speculators would dearly love to mount a bull run 
on it, but cannot, because it is far from being a freely traded, 
widely-held currency.  
  
The long-term future of the dollar is a more open question. But 
please note that when the dollar declined sharply after the Plaza 
Accord, it was not displaced as a reserve currency by the yen or the 
mark.  
  
Its status depends more on the confidence that savers have in the 
future of the US economy and the range of services they can get from 
US financial markets.  
  
Where does that leave the rupee and the prospects for the Indian 
economy? Over the past few years, the rupee has appreciated against 
the yuan and some other Asian currencies.  
  
An upward readjustment of these against the dollar would help to 
correct this if the RBI is able to neutralise the huge FII inflows. 
That will help Indian exporters, but involve some inflationary 
pressures.  
  
But, if the fears of a hard landing voiced above are borne out, then 
the slowing down of growth in the US and elsewhere will hurt India. 
It may even put some downward pressure on the exchange rate if the 
investment inflows dry up.  
  
So the upshot of all this is that anything could happen in exchange 
markets. So toss a coin, as Greenspan suggests, and hope that the US 
does not fix things so that heads they win and tails we lose!  
  
(The author is former chief economic advisor to the government of 
India, and former under secretary general, United Nations)  









------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater?
Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TzSHvD/SOnJAA/79vVAA/NJYolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

��������������������������������������������������������
This is ZESTEconomics. Post economics-related articles and event info to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTEconomics by sending a 
blank mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, visit 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/join

==theZESTcommunity======================================

[1] ZESTCurrent: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCurrent/
[2] ZESTEconomics: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/
[3] ZESTGlobal: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/
[4] ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/
[5] ZESTPoets: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTPoets/
[6] ZESTCaste: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/
[7] ZESTAlternative: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTAlternative/
[8] TalkZEST: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TalkZEST/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to