The rise of fiscal terror 
  By Sudhir Saxena,
  The Indian Express | March 23, 2005
  http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=66971
  
By targetting the IT industry, terrorists are revealing that the 
Indian economy may increasingly be their target 

  
The elimination of the Delhi based Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) cell on 6 
March 2005, could possibly indicate a new trend in Pakistan-based 
terror operations in India. Preliminary reports indicate that these 
terrorists were intending to strike against the Indian Military 
Academy (IMA) and the IT infrastructure especially in Bangalore 
using the network of the banned Students Islamic Movement of India 
(SIMI). A couple of issues emerge from the episode. First, is this 
an indication of widening of the area of operations by the LeT and 
similar groups away from Jammu and Kashmir and North India to 
relatively un-touched peninsular India? Secondly, do the plans of 
the captured terrorist suggest a change in the nature of targets 
from tactical to strategic, indicating increasing complexity of 
conceptual planning and hence institutional involvement? 
Jammu and Kashmir is undergoing a rather harsh and prolonged winter 
snow fall season. Like the tsunami, unpredictable mother nature 
seems to have purged any possibility of an escalation of terrorist 
activity. Further, the Indo-Pak Composite Dialogue Process (CDP) 
process (agreed to in January 2004) has shrunk the political space 
for high-intensity, high-frequency terror operations. It is quite 
possible that the political and geo-climactic factors may have 
forced the terrorists to shift areas of operation southwards and if 
possible perform a repeat of the 12/13 attack on the Parliament. 
Though, there have been sporadic incidents involving J&K terrorist 
(like LeT) operating in areas like Hyderabad, the phenomenon could 
not be termed as wide spread, possibly due to logistical reasons. 
The planned future intentions of the LeT cell captured in Delhi may 
indicate just such a spread. 

The choice of targets certainly raises a new warning. It is known 
that the IT industry has been one of the success stories 
contributing to the growing vitality of the Indian economy. The 
amount of RDX captured (10.5 kgs along with detonators) provides 
clues to the nature and explosive power of the planned operation. 
However, a pertinent question needs to be answered - was blowing up 
few buildings of the Polaris company the only aim of the now failed 
operation, or was there a larger objective? A strike against a 
leading IT company and its aftermath would have no doubt lead to 
many tactical counter-operational and intelligence measures. But it 
would have also left a certain wariness in the investor market, 
particularly in the FDI sector, which is very sensitive about 
security of its assets give the experience in Iraq, Afghanistan and 
certain African locations. A planned strike at IMA, Dehradun is 
indicative of similar operations by the Zarqawi group in Iraq. 

As a first choice, the facts point towards the culprit state actor - 
Pakistan. The Delhi police has claimed that with the capture of 
Pakistani nationals along with incriminating documents, passports, 
the operation provides direct evidence of Pakistani involvement in 
country wide terrorist activity. Recent media reports also indicate 
a relative increase in the arrests of Pakistani spies in Delhi and 
other areas of strategic importance. The information being traded by 
these enemy agents cover a range of issues of national security 
importance including defence installations, industrial 
infrastructure, R&D institutions etc. It seems that despite the Indo-
Pak dialogue, increasing people-to-people contact, cricket matches 
and CBMs, Pakistani intelligence agencies and/or Pakistan leadership 
does not intend to lose that vital strategic advantage gained 
through terror leverages mustered over the decades. From their point 
of view it sounds to be a logical and viable state-craft option. 

To extend the analysis, if one partially absolves Musharraf's 
Pakistan of an all out covert war in the current context, 
involvement of a larger terrorist entity like the Al Qaeda with 
rogue Pakistani support seems to be the second probability. 
Traditionally, analysts have believed that India does not appear 
high on the Al Qaeda's priority list. Possibly, Iraq, Afghanistan, 
Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Gaza, West Bank and the USA remain the 
priority targets. An increasing pressure in North West Pakistan by 
the US and Pakistani agencies (under duress), may be forcing Al 
Qaeda hierarchy to look for other alternatives as an operational 
exigency. It is known that Nepal and Bangladesh have been 
comfortable hiding places for terrorists for some time now. 

However, Nepal with its current political crisis and Bangladesh with 
its politico-religious configuration of governance have invited 
increasing international scrutiny. Bangladesh has actually started 
responding to the Indian pressure to clean-up its territory of 
terrorist elements. This could be uncomfortable for the terrorist 
entities either residing in these countries or operating from their 
soil. It needs little elaboration that Pakistani agencies are also 
under ``friendly'' obligation to rehabilitate these old associates 
in a productive manner. 

In the past Al Qaeda had possibly left J&K to its junior partners 
like LeT, Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM), Hizbul and Harkat variants. 
However, under the present circumstances, the ``big guys'' may be 
deciding to drop-in and take charge of operations in India, though 
not directly. This may explain the strategic target selection by the 
terrorist captured in Delhi. It is known that Al Qaeda had developed 
an elaborate strategy of purging the US economy through various 
complicated ``fiscal attacks'' ranging from disrupting fund supplies 
to targeting banking infrastructure and stock market mechanism. Was 
something similar under planning in case of the LeT cadres operating 
out of Delhi? 

It does seems obvious that in both scenarios, the first beneficiary 
of such a wide planned terror act will be Pakistan. As a secondary 
effect, Al Qaeda gains will be at present limited to the larger 
jihadi success in the region. It is natural to be alarmist in threat 
assessment and probably safer as well, but given the past history of 
the involvement of Pakistan backed terror syndicates in attacking 
the Indian state and society, it is difficult to ignore the 
aforementioned possibilities. We may not have the colour code threat 
indicators as yet, but the terror bar seems to be showing spikes and 
presumably the Indian security establishment will raise these 
concerns with Condoleezza Rice during her visit to Delhi. 


Sqn.Ldr Saxena (rtd) is a Research Fellow, IDSA. The views expressed 
are personal 









------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater?
Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TzSHvD/SOnJAA/79vVAA/NJYolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

��������������������������������������������������������
This is ZESTEconomics. Post economics-related articles and event info to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTEconomics by sending a 
blank mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, visit 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/join

==theZESTcommunity======================================

[1] ZESTCurrent: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCurrent/
[2] ZESTEconomics: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/
[3] ZESTGlobal: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/
[4] ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/
[5] ZESTPoets: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTPoets/
[6] ZESTCaste: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/
[7] ZESTAlternative: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTAlternative/
[8] TalkZEST: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TalkZEST/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to