Pulling the workhorse, driving the rickshaw 
  Despite notoriously variable and low earnings, close to 30% of the 
male population in Bilaspur's Chingrajpara slum are cycle-rickshaw 
pullers. Third in the SLUM DIARIES series, Ashima Sood cuts across 
boundaries to chronicle the forces impinging on the pullers' 
livelihoods.
 
  By Ashima Sood
  India Together | March 26, 2005 (Second Issue)
  
  For pix and other graphix please see:
  http://www.indiatogether.org/2005/mar/eco-chingpar3.htm 


The cycle-rickshaw stand at the railway station is the workplace for 
a wide swathe of Bilaspur city's male population. Many others make 
their living by commuting daily from rural areas in Bilaspur district 
and outside it to hire and drive a rickshaw for half-day stretches. 
Still others arrive regularly for short stays during which they may 
sometimes find rough shelter at the garage where they hire their 
rickshaws. The few ones unlucky enough not to find such accommodation 
must make the rickshaw their bed under the stars. 

In a sector characterized by notoriously variable earnings, rickshaw 
drivers work hard for their daily earnings. Yet along with 
vending/hawking, rickshaw-driving continues to be one of the largest 
self-employment segments of Bilaspur's informal sector. A survey 
conducted at the end of 2001 in Chingrajpara by ActionAid found that 
28 per cent of the surveyed population reported its occupation 
as `cycle-rickshaw puller', making it the second largest occupational 
category after unskilled labourers (and the largest occupational 
category for men). 

The so-called `garages' provide a livelihood of first resort to short-
term and longer term migrants, and others. For a hire charge ranging 
from Rs.10 for a half-day rental to Rs.20 for 24 hours, these garages 
supply the capital component of the rickshaw-driver's business. They 
also supply, depending on the size of their operation, varying levels 
of maintenance support to the rickshaw. (Rs.44 is approximately 1 
US$) 

Those who know to look can spot these dusty roadside establishments 
everywhere - close to slum areas but also in some of Bilaspur's more 
middle-class localities - identifiable by the cluster of night-time 
rickshaws parked nearby. In other North Indian cities, most notably 
the capital, the corrupt and stringent enforcement of a law that 
attempts to limit the number of rickshaws an individual may own has 
been the locus of a remarkable public policy campaign led by 
organizations such as Lokayan and Manushi. 

In Bilaspur however a somnolent administration allows garages to 
function in peace. The result is an unhindered burgeoning of the 
cycle-rickshaw sector, visible in the proliferation of garages, 
mostly miniscule. Fully half of the 176 garages I surveyed in the 
city owned less than 12 rickshaws, a quarter owned less than seven. 
Many others hidden away in the nooks and crannies of the city are 
nearly impossible to track down. 

The cycle-rickshaw sector in Bilaspur and elsewhere has many of the 
features of what the International Labour Organization (ILO) calls 
the informal sector (also sometimes called the unorganized sector) � 
a sector defined by unregulated working conditions, small-scale 
operation, and conditions of nearly free entry. Conservative 
estimates of the percentage of non-agricultural informal sector 
employment in India start at 55.7 per cent. (Figures cited in a 
OECD/UNESCAP/ADB workshop on the informal sector in Bangkok in May 
2004.) 

And to understand the forces that impinge on the livelihoods of 
Chingrajpara's rickshaw drivers it becomes necessary to go beyond the 
slum's boundaries. 

I. The resident 

Late one January morning in 2004, thirty-year old Raju, having taken 
off sick from work, hangs around as his wife's Mahila Samiti meeting 
convenes in a small clearing near his home in Asha Abhiyan's Nodal II 
construction area. (Asha Abhiyan, is a slum development project, 
initiated in the early 1990s by Harsh Mander, then Bilaspur's 
Commissioner. It was reinitiated when he became a country* director 
at ActionAid India.) Like many of Bilaspur's rickshaw drivers Raju, a 
father of four, is a deceptively small, wiry man. Unlike four-fifths 
of Bilaspur's rickshaw drivers however, Raju owns his own rickshaw, 
bought second-hand for Rs. 2200. 

As a holder of the patta (title) to the plot of land on which his 
pucca house stands, Raju is lucky in other ways as well. Yet he 
himself does not feel very lucky. Indeed given half a chance he would 
shift to another occupation. It is a rare day indeed when he makes Rs 
100; the average earnings for 8 hours of work are closer to half 
that. On most days he says he feels feverish and suffers an 
assortment of aches and pains. It is too much hard work, he says, and 
too much competition, thanks to all these outsiders driving 
rickshaws. According to Raju, it definitely was better before the 
mushrooming of garages. In fact, he has a simple policy expedient to 
offer to improve the livelihoods of the rickshaw-drivers � shut down 
all garages, period. 

Similar hostility veiled or otherwise, emerge in focus groups of 
rickshaw drivers in other slums across the city. (Focus groups are 
discussions as part of the Asha Abhiyan project to elicit views.) The 
more the garages, the more the competition among them, and the easier 
it is for any Ram, Shyam and Salim from outside to hire a rickshaw 
and drive it on the city's streets, often at cut-rate fares. Some of 
the more sophisticated members of these groups, many of whom arrived 
in Bilaspur city in similar circumstances and recognize that a 
majority hire rickshaws from the garages as well, are more 
circumspect. 

All of them rightly bemoan the absence of a viable union to champion 
the rights of the rickshaw drivers against both the garages and the 
occasional brutality of the railway police. And the grumbling about 
migrants continues from there � among other things, about the 
thieving habits of the migrants that besmirch the occupation as a 
whole. 


II. The commuter 

The day we meet him at Bilaspur's railway station Amrit Satnami is 
sporting a brand-new dress shirt of obvious good quality, gifted to 
him he claims by a `seth' that he drove over to the bus stop area. 
Dubious as his story sounds, his manner has something guileless about 
it, bringing to mind that untranslatable Hindi word `santoshi' - 
content, at peace with himself and the world. After a lot of thought 
he decides the occupation he would like most would be to run a `suhag 
bhandar', a cosmetics shop, in his village where he already owns some 
3-4 decimal land (0.002 hectare). Although we have introduced 
ourselves as a team of researchers, he quite belatedly realizes that 
we may have links to sarkari benefactors and concedes it would be 
nice to have his own rickshaw. 

Forty and utterly illiterate, Amrit has commuted daily by train for 7-
8 years from his home in Arjuni, Thana Akalta, district Janjgir to 
Bilaspur city to drive a rented rickshaw. On days when he works too 
late or is otherwise indisposed to return home, he sleeps out in the 
open on a rickshaw at the garage. The Rs 60-70 Amrit saves after a 
day's driving is about double what his wife makes as an agricultural 
labourer in his village. Together their earnings support their family 
of six. Though a gift rickshaw would no doubt augment Amrit's assets, 
it is not clear how in itself, it would significantly affect his 
occupational choices, or for that matter, the livelihoods of resident 
rickshaw-pullers. What appears indisputable is that the presence of a 
garage supplies a convenient if less than adequate source for 
earnings to him and others like him. 

It is also unsurprising that although one of Bilaspur's very few 
active rickshaw-pullers unions operates near the railway station, 
Amrit is uninterested in it. As a migrant, the living he makes is as 
is an improvement over what he would have made in his village; he 
neither feels a stake in the benefits the union offers nor does he 
have the time for rallies and political action. In turn the union 
does not make the effort to include the likes of Amrit Satnami. 

In unrestricted entry, high mobility situations characteristic of the 
informal sector, mobilizing and organizing workers' movements is 
recognized to be a feat requiring considerable skill and dedication. 
Still, the rickshaw-drivers need organization and representation not 
only to resist the occasional, usually unsuccessful, attempts at 
collusion by garage-owners but also to pressure the state into 
modifying its long-standing policy of malign neglect. 

An excellent example of the kind of concrete government action that 
is required was provided by an articulate rickshaw-driver Raju 
Dindore in a focus group discussion. The stresses and strains of a 
life of hard physical labour take their toll on the productivity of 
the rickshaw drivers past a certain age, Dindore pointed out. Why not 
institute an early 'pension' scheme for rickshaw-drivers, say at age 
45 or 50, to compensate for that loss? 

Why not indeed. Except that even the government's existing Janshri 
Group Insurance scheme for accidental death and dismemberment, 
indifferently administered by the municipal corporation languishes 
for lack of efficient promotion. Many rickshaw-drivers I spoke to 
expressed skepticism that their annual Rs 10 premium payment would 
yield a real security to their families. (It is instructive to note 
that under this scheme, the stipulated mode of payment of benefits to 
families - that are unlikely to hold savings accounts in formal 
banks � is an account payee cheque.) 

This is precisely where civic association, especially some form of 
trade union can perform an important function � it can create a more 
effective demand for public services by stepping in as via media 
between the state and the informal sector worker. 

III. The migrant 

The case of Ramu Chaudhary, who I met in my first visit to 
Chingrajpara during 2002, throws helpful, and poignant, light on the 
livelihood issues that confront the rickshaw driver and the thorny 
questions they raise. 

Ramu Chaudhary was twelve when at the invitation of a maternal uncle 
he first left his home in Madhubani village near Patna, Bihar to go 
work 'for a year or two' in a coal mine near Korba, Chhattisgarh. But 
his path away from home led him next to Delhi, where he found work in 
a tent house. At Rs.100 daily his was the highly precarious task of 
lighting outdoor weddings. After eight years of Delhi, driven by 
restlessness or something else, he arrived in Bilaspur. It was while 
working at a roadside 'hotel' that he met Sheela and convinced her to 
elope with him. That was when he turned for a livelihood to rickshaw-
driving, among other things. 

Rokando, Chingrajpara's illegitimate sister settlement, is where the 
young couple now live, in a low-roofed bamboo pole and plastic 
sheeting structure they recently constructed with a loan of Rs.1000 
from a neighbour. Despite the more than fifteen years of migrancy 
that Ramu claims he looks no more than twenty or so. Living a life 
that thrusts most others quickly into adulthood and past that into 
old age, Ramu and Sheela still retain a surly, slightly sleepy air of 
adolescence. They are still childless after three years of marriage; 
neither knows how old they are. Their relationship seems to have 
retained a kind of childlike parity � when asked, Sheela still 
reports her maiden name, Sahu. Their replies to most of my questions 
are monosyllabic; unlike most others, they are unmoved by 
researchers' curiosity about their lives. From the sparse details 
they provide me however the only certain fact is their desperate 
poverty. 

Some days Ramu goes to the casual labour market at nearby Sanichari; 
when he gets no work, he goes rickshaw-driving in the afternoon. 
Earnings in either direction are uncertain � while a labour 
contractor still has not paid Ramu the Rs.300 he is owed for a 
construction project, driving a rickshaw sometimes gets Ramu up to 
Rs.100 and other times, after paying the garage owner, nothing. To 
the corner grocer they owe Rs. 30. To the neighbour Rs.1000 plus 
Rs.40 monthly interest. Savings are sparse. Lacking a ration card, 
they buy food on a daily basis. About half a week out of every month, 
they do not have enough to eat. 

The municipal authorities meanwhile are planning to move Rokando 
residents lock, stock and barrel to a location eight kilometres away. 
For daily wagers like Ramu the daily commute is forbidding. When he 
suggests his usual solution, another migration, Sheela resists. He 
has left his family far behind but her own aging mother still lives 
in Bilaspur. 

The tale of Ramu and Sheela is more than a chronicle of woes. Though 
he has been in Bilaspur for some seven years, Ramu is essentially 
rootless in his milieu. While most of the urban poor, particularly in 
authorized slums, manage a degree of adjustment to their 
circumstances, Ramu is asunder in economic uncertainty. He is not 
a `vulnerable' section of society except by the fact of his ignorance 
and his migrant status. And the problems of those like Ramu and 
Sheela are too complicated, too well-entrenched to be done away by 
one stroke of governmental munificence. Instead the discrete pieces 
that add up to their difficulties require a larger, less specific 
solution. 


* * * 
A well-functioning civic association such as a rickshaw-driver's 
union may do much for Ramu. For pointers we may consider SEWA, one of 
the world's most successful informal sector unions, operating in a 
range of sectors from bidis to construction labour. For the women who 
are its members, the movement provides not merely advocacy services 
but also context, the solidarity and social support that the self-
employed worker often misses. In this scenario, it is possible to 
imagine the union as being less a divisive tool of the native against 
the migrant and more as a network resource available to all. 

Other practical inspiration may be found in the hoary past of Delhi's 
earliest rickshaw-puller unions. Rajendra Ravi of Lokayan's Jan 
Parivahan Samiti recounts the case of one such union that set up a 
rickshaw cooperative in the 1950s that as an alternative to garages 
hired out rickshaws at nominal charge and provided repair and 
maintenance services. While the experiment did not last into the 
present it survived a good number of years till Delhi's explosive 
growth put an end to it. For the worst-off rickshaw-drivers like 
Ramu, migrants trying to start a life in Bilaspur, for whom the hire 
charges from garages can be a burden, a model like this suggests an 
inclusive solution. 

But even a union that accounts for the realities that rickshaw-
drivers of Bilaspur, resident and migrant alike face, needs an issue 
to rally members around. The railway station's Rickshaw Sangh has 
wrested small-scale concessions from the railway authorities but its 
reach remains constrained by politicking and top-down leadership. 
Local leaders of established unions such as INTUC have attempted the 
task of mobilization and surrendered. So far, unions have worked on 
finding an enemy to unite the drivers against � the garages, 
migrants, government authorities. However, for self-employed workers 
the task of defending their interests against the outside world must 
be accompanied by the much more intricate project of building a 
consciousness. The next round is awaited. 


* * *
Postscript, March, 2005: Rokando is still there and although the 
government continues to plans its move further away, the Asha Abhiyan 
staff are working to get the settlement authorized and construct 
pucca housing for the slum dwellers. ⊕ 

________________________________________________________
Ashima Sood is a graduate student at Cornell University, New York. 
Names have been changed to protect the identities of the individuals 
in this article. The author wishes to acknowledge the people of 
Chingrajpara for sharing their experiences, and ActionAid and its 
Chhatisgarh team for making this work possible. Many thanks to the 
Maini family for their wonderful hospitality. 

Errata:
Original line: "It was reinitiated when he became a director at 
ActionAid India". Revised 30 Mar 2005. 








------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not own computers.
At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EA3HyD/3MnJAA/79vVAA/NJYolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

��������������������������������������������������������
This is ZESTEconomics. Post economics-related articles and event info to 
[email protected]

If you got this mail as a forward, subscribe to ZESTEconomics by sending a 
blank mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR, if you have a Yahoo! ID, visit 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/join

==theZESTcommunity======================================

[1] ZESTCurrent: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCurrent/
[2] ZESTEconomics: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/
[3] ZESTGlobal: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTGlobal/
[4] ZESTMedia: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTMedia/
[5] ZESTPoets: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTPoets/
[6] ZESTCaste: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTCaste/
[7] ZESTAlternative: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTAlternative/
[8] TalkZEST: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TalkZEST/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZESTEconomics/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to