On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 03:11:27PM -0700, Eric Schrock wrote:
> Absolutely. I wasn't suggesting otherwise, just trying to clarify what
> each patch was about. It's interesting because we compile ON with gcc,
> but must be using a different set of warning flags.
OK, thank you.
Ceri
--
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-- Moliere
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-code/attachments/20060821/75743a20/attachment.bin>
