Luke Lonergan wrote:
Robert,

On 8/8/06 9:11 AM, "Robert Milkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


1. UFS, noatime, HW RAID5 6 disks, S10U2
    70MB/s
2. ZFS, atime=off, HW RAID5 6 disks, S10U2 (the same lun as in #1)
    87MB/s
3. ZFS, atime=off, SW RAID-Z 6 disks, S10U2
    130MB/s
4. ZFS, atime=off, SW RAID-Z 6 disks, snv_44
    133MB/s


Well, the UFS results are miserable, but the ZFS results aren't good - I'd
expect between 250-350MB/s from a 6-disk RAID5 with read() blocksize from
8kb to 32kb.

Most of my ZFS experiments have been with RAID10, but there were some
massive improvements to seq I/O with the fixes I mentioned - I'd expect that
this shows that they aren't in snv44.

Those fixes went into snv_45

-Mark
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to