Hi Michael.  Based on the output, there should be no user-visible file
corruption.  ZFS saw a bunch of checksum errors on the disk, but was
able to recover in every instance.

While 2-disk RAID-Z is really a fancy (and slightly more expensive,
CPU-wise) way of doing mirroring, at no point should your data be at
risk.

I've been working on ZFS a long time, and if what you say is true, it
will be the first instance I have ever seen (or heard) of such a
phenomenon.  I strongly doubt that somehow ZFS returned corrupted data
without knowing about it.  How are you sure that some application on
your box didn't modify the contents of the files?


--Bill


On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 02:01:39AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm new to this group, so hello everyone! I am having some issues with my 
> Nexenta system I set up about two months ago as a zfs/zraid server. I have 
> two new Maxtor 500GB Sata drives and an Adaptec controller which I believe 
> has a Silicon Image chipset. Also I have a Seasonic 80+ power supply, so the 
> power should be as clean as you can get. I had an issue with Nexenta where I 
> had to reinstall, and since then everytime I reboot I have to type
> 
> zpool export amber
> zpool import amber
> 
> to get my zfs volume mounted. A week ago I noticed a couple of CKSUM errors 
> when I did a zpool status, so I did a zpool scrub. This is the output after:
> 
> # zpool status
>   pool: amber
>  state: ONLINE
> status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error.  An
>         attempt was made to correct the error.  Applications are unaffected.
> action: Determine if the device needs to be replaced, and clear the errors
>         using 'zpool clear' or replace the device with 'zpool replace'.
>    see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-9P
>  scrub: scrub completed with 0 errors on Mon Nov 13 04:49:35 2006
> config:
> 
>         NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
>         amber       ONLINE       0     0     0
>           raidz1    ONLINE       0     0     0
>             c4d0    ONLINE       0     0    51
>             c5d0    ONLINE       0     0    41
> 
> errors: No known data errors
> 
> 
> I have md5sums on a lot of the files and it looks like maybe 5% of my files 
> are corrupted. Does anyone have any ideas? I was under the impression that 
> zfs was pretty reliable but I guess with any software it needs time to get 
> the bugs ironed out.
> 
> Michael
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to