On 02/12/06, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Dec 2, 2006, at 10:56 AM, Al Hopper wrote: > On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote:
>> On Dec 2, 2006, at 6:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> When you have subtle corruption, some of the data and meta data is >> bad but not all. In that case you can recover (and verify the data >> if you have the means to do so) t he parts that did not get >> corrupted. My ZFS experience so far is that it basically said the >> whole 20GB pool was dead and I seriously doubt all 20GB was >> corrupted.
> That was because you built a pool with no redundancy. In the case > where > ZFS does not have a redundant config from which to try to > reconstruct the > data (today) it simply says: sorry charlie - you pool is corrupt.
Where a RAID system would still be salvageable.
RAID level what? How is anything salvagable if you lose your only copy? ZFS does store multiple copies of metadata in a single vdev, so I assume we're talking about data here. -- Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns http://number9.hellooperator.net/ _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
