Hello,
After an export and an importation, the size of the pool remains
unchanged. As there were no data on this partition, I destroyed and
recreate the pool. The size was indeed taken into account.
The correct size is indicated by the order "zpool list". The order "df
- k" shows a size higher than the real size. The order "zfs list" shows
a lower size. Why?
# df -k
data 3055288320 24 3055288244 1% /data
# zpool list
NAME SIZE USED AVAIL CAP HEALTH ALTROOT
data 2,89T 184K 2,89T 0% EN LIGNE -
# zfs list
NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT
data 75,5K 2,85T 24,5K /data
Thanks.
Nathalie.
Hello Nathalie,
Monday, December 18, 2006, 2:14:29 PM, you wrote:
NPI> I have a machine with ZFS connected to a SAN. The space of storage
NPI> increased on the SAN. The order "format" shows the increase in volume
NPI> well. But the size of the ZFS pool did not increase. What to make so
NPI> that zfs takes into account this increase in volume?
I haven't tested it but I belive right now you have to export pool,
using format put new label on disks so format will show you disks are
actually bigger, then re-import pool (or change slice sizes if you put
zfs on slices).
There's undergoing project to make it more automatic with ZFS.
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
