On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:04:06PM +0200, Robert Milkowski wrote: > If I stop all activity to x4500 with a pool made of several raidz2 and > then I issue spare attach I get really poor performance (1-2MB/s) on a > pool with lot of relatively small files.
Does that mean the spare is resilvering when you collect the performance data? I think a fair test would be to compare the performance of a fully functional RAID-Z stripe against a one with a missing (absent) device. Adam -- Adam Leventhal, Solaris Kernel Development http://blogs.sun.com/ahl _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
