What does 'zdb -l /dev/dsk/<device>s0' show for each device? - Eric
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 04:45:40PM -0500, Jeff Bachtel wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 01:39:26PM -0700, Richard Elling wrote: > > Jeff Bachtel wrote: > > >On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 09:38:17AM -0700, Richard Elling wrote: > > >>can you see the LUN in format? > > > > > >Yes. Additionally, I can dd from the rdsk device to a file, and get > > >enough data to confirm that the disk devices are members of the old > > >zpools, and still have data. > > > > OK, I suspect the complaint is because ZFS sees the exact same ID > > on both drives. > > Which ID would that be, and which drives? > > I've updated one of the systems to snv 72, and I'm still getting the > "Create devinfo" warning, and the imports are still not going. > > cfgadm seems, sane, a la: > > imsfs-mirror:~> sudo cfgadm -la c2 > Ap_Id Type Receptacle Occupant Condition > c2 fc-fabric connected configured unknown > c2::21000004d9600099 disk connected configured unknown > c2::21000004d960cded disk connected configured unknown > > devinfo, once I figured out how to call it, also seems sane: > imsfs-mirror:~> sudo devinfo -i /dev/rdsk/c2t21000004D960CDEDd7s2 > /dev/rdsk/c2t21000004D960CDEDd7s2 0 0 32130 512 > 2 > imsfs-mirror:~> sudo devinfo -p /dev/rdsk/c2t21000004D960CDEDd7s2 > /dev/rdsk/c2t21000004D960CDEDd7s2 36 682 0 > 1465031610 0 5 > > As I mentioned, I can dd the raw device and get valid data (although > I've no way to verify that ZFS metadata is at the beginning of the > disks). > > Is there a documented example of using DTrace to examine what zpool is > seeing/discarding while it scans for pools? One of these ZFS pools had > its members totally renamed (the port used on the disk array got > switched, and so the WWN changed), but the other should still be the > same. > > I'm close to downgrading to snv_69 on one of the machines to see if it > can import the pools, but after doing some research it seems that > other people have had mysterious import problems that never resolved. > > (Richard, I'm sending this back to zfs-discuss, but only because I > added more debug info that might mean something to someone else.) > > Jeff > > > > -- richard > > -- > Jeff Bachtel ([EMAIL PROTECTED],TAMU) http://www.cepheid.org/~jeff > "The sciences, each straining in [finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for PGP key] > its own direction, have hitherto harmed us little;" - HPL, TCoC > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss -- Eric Schrock, Solaris Kernel Development http://blogs.sun.com/eschrock _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
