Gino wrote:
>> The x4500 is very sweet and the only thing stopping
>> us from buying two
>> instead of another shelf is the fact that we have
>> lost pools on Sol10u3
>> servers and there is no easy way of making two pools
>> redundant (ie the
>> complexity of clustering.) Simply sending incremental
>> snapshots is not a
>> viable option.
>>
>> The pools we lost were pools on iSCSI (in a mirrored
>> config) and they
>> were mostly lost on zpool import/export. The lack of
>> a recovery
>> mechanism really limits how much faith we can put
>> into our data on ZFS.
>> It's safe as long as the pool is safe... but we've
>> lost multiple pools.
>>
>
> Hello Tim,
> did you try SNV60+ or S10U4 ?
>
> Gino
>
Hi Gino,
We need Solaris proper for these systems and we will have to
schedule a significant downtime to patch update to U4.
-Tim
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
