I did that - it was nice.  Took forever though on my PIII 700mhz :^)

blake/

On 9/27/07, Solaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I considered this as well, but that's the beauty of marrying ZFS with
> a hotplug SATA backplane :)
>
> I chose the to use the 5-in-3 hot-swap chassis in order to give me a
> way to upgrade capacity in place, though the 4-in-3 would be as easy,
> though with higher risk.
>
> 1.  hot-plug a new 500GB SATA disk into the 5th spot in the backplane.
>
> 2.  zpool replace mypool c1t3d0 c1t4d0
>   where c1t[0-3]d0 are my currently active 250GB drives
>
> 3.  wait for resilver to complete.
>
> 4.  hot-pull c1t3d0 and pull the drive from the chassis, replace with
> new 500GB drive, hot-plug back into backplane.
>
> 5.  zpool replace mypool c1t0d0 c1t3d0
>
> 6.  wait for resilver to complete, rinse and repeat.
>
> As soon as all disks have been replaced, my zpool will be 1TB, not 500GB.
>
> On 9/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:20:15 -0500
> > From: David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Best option for my home file server?
> > To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> >
> > Blake wrote:
> > >> Obviously from a cost AND size perspective it would be best/smart to
> go
> > >> for option 3 and have a raidz of 4x250 and one of 6x500.
> > >>
> > >> Comments?
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> > How long are you going to need this data?  Do you have an easy and quick
> > way to back it all up?  Is the volume you need going to grow over time?
> > For *my* home server, the need to expand over time ended up dominating
> > the disk architecture, and I chose a less efficient (more space/money
> > lost to redundant storage) architecture that was easier to upgrade in
> > small increments, because that fit my intention to maintain the data
> > long-term, and the lack of any efficient easy way to back up and restore
> > the data (I *do* back it up to external firewire disks, but it takes 8
> > hours or so, so I don't want to have to have the system down for a full
> > two-way copy when I need to upgrade the disk sizes).
> >
> > --
> > David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED]; http://dd-b.net/
> > Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/
> > Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/
> > Dragaera: http://dragaera.info
> >
> _______________________________________________
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to