Frank Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why do you beliece there is a need for a pathconf() call?
> > Either rename(2) succeeds or it fails with a cross-device error.
>
> Why do you have a NAME_MAX / SYMLINK_MAX query - you can just as well let
> such requests fail with ENAMETOOLONG.
>
> Why do you have a FILESIZEBITS query - there's EOVERFLOW to tell you.
>
>
> There's no _need_. But the convenience exists for others as well.
What kind of call do you propose?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
