So yeah, you just supported what I said about a database on top of a filesystem being useful because HFS uses a database type structure for it's catalog. It's an object based storage but the schema in HFS isn't as extensible as to what I'm referring to in future Content Addressable Storage systems. There's more than WinFs obviously out there including the future versions of SAM-FS/QFS, but the thread was about WinFS specifically. This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS? Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS? Orvar Korvar
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS? Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS? Richard Elling
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS? Darren J Moffat
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS? MC
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS? Mario Goebbels
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS? Bryan Wagoner
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS? Orvar Korvar
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS? Dick Davies
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS? Bryan Wagoner
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS? Orvar Korvar
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS for ZFS... Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Microsoft WinFS fo... Bryan Wagoner