"The important thing is to protect your data. You have lots of options here,
so we'd need to know more precisely what the other requirements are before
we could give better advice.
-- richard"

Please let me come in with a parallel need, the answer to which should 
contribute to this thread.

-Physical details:
3-drive (plus DVD) box with Micro-ATX board, 1 on-board controller and the 
option for one raid card.  Actual board, CPU and Memory yet-to-be-spec'd, but 
we'll throw in whatever the "hardware-compatible" Micro-ATX board can handle.
-Software details:
OpenSolaris 2008-05, ZFS+PostgreSQL+Python.
-Mission:
ZFS box is to watch a Windoze box (or a MAC box) on which new files are being 
created and old ones changed, plus many deletions (animation system).
-Objectives:
(a) make periodic snapshots of animator's box (actual copies of files) onto ZFS 
box, and
(b) Write metadata into the PostgreSQL database to record event changes 
happening to key files.
-Design concept:
Integrate ZFS+SQL+Python into a rules-based backup device that notifies a third 
party elsewhere in the world about project progress (or lack thereof), and 
forwards key files and the SQL metadata (via internet) to some host ZFS box 
elsewhere.
-Observations:
(a) The local and the host ZFS boxes are not expected to contain the same 
images; indeed, many local ZFS boxes will be distributed, and one host ZFS box 
will be the ultimate repository of "completed" works.
(b) High Performance is not an overriding consideration because this box 
"serves" only two users (the watched box on the local network and the host down 
the internet pipe).

Question that relates to the on-going thread:
What configuration of ZFS and the hardware would serve "reliable and cheap"?

David Singer
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to