On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 03:02:43PM -0700, Erik Trimble wrote: > Unfortunately, we need to be careful here with our terminology.
You are completely and 100% correct, Erik. I've been throwing the term SSD around, but in the context of what I'm thinking, by SSD I mean this new-fangled flash based SSD. > In this case, I think we want the DRAM SSDs. Yes, yes you do. I know I say this all the time, and I'm sure you're all getting tired of me, but I *really* wish Gigabyte (or *ANYONE ELSE*, ahem, Sun, *cough*) would produce something similar to the iRAM, but with 3.0Gpbs SATA/SAS and possibly more space, or at least newer, easier to find RAM. That would make me *extremely* happy. ;) I wish I had the money to bankroll something like that. But sadly, I don't. -brian -- "Coding in C is like sending a 3 year old to do groceries. You gotta tell them exactly what you want or you'll end up with a cupboard full of pop tarts and pancake mix." -- IRC User (http://www.bash.org/?841435) _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
