Dave Miner wrote: >> I agree - I am just thinking, if it is fine in general to allow >> normal non-experienced user (who is the target audience for Slim >> installer) to run system without swap. To be honest, I don't know, >> since I am not very experienced in this area. >> If people agree that this is not issue at all, I don't have any >> objections against making swap optional. >> > > Now that we don't have to reserve slices for it, making swap optional in > the space calculation is fine. We don't place any lower limits on > memory, and it's just virtual memory, after all. Besides which, we can > infer that the system works well enough for the user's purposes without > swap since the boot from the CD won't have used any swap.
That is a good point. Based on this and also on Jeff's comment I will make swap optional as well. Thank you, Jan _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
