> We haven't had any "real life" drive failures at work, but at home I
> took some old flaky IDE drives and put them in a pentium 3 box running
> Nevada. 

Similar story here.  Some IDE and SATA drive burps under Linux (and
please don't tell me how wonderful Reiser4 is - 'cause it's banned in
this house forever.... arrrrgh) and Windows.   It ate my entire iTunes
library.  Yeah, lurve that silent data corruption feature.

>  Several of them were known to cause errors under Linux, so I
> mirrored them in approximately-the-same-size pairs and set up weekly
> scrubs.  Two drives out of six failed entirely, and were nicely
> retired, before I gave up on the idea and bought new disks. 

Pretty cool, eh ?

> Finally, at work we're switching everything over to ZFS because it's
> so convenient... but we keep tape backups nonetheless.  

A very good idea.  Disasters will still occur.  With enough storage,
snapshots can eliminate the routine file by file restores but a complete
meltdown is always a possibility.  So backups aren't optional, but I
find myself doing very few restores any more.


Bob

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to