Couple of questions, What version of Solaris are you using? (cat /etc/release) If you're exposing each disk individually through a LUN/2540 Volume, you don't really gain anything by having a spare on the 2540 (which I assume you're doing by only exposing 11 LUNs instead of 12). Your best bet is to set no spares on the 2540 and then set one of the LUNs as a spare via ZFS. How will you be using the storage? This will help determine how your zpool should be structured.
-Aaron On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Kenny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone had issues with creating ZFS pools greater than 1 terabyte (TB)? > > I've created 11 LUNs from a Sun 2540 Disk array (approx 1 TB each). The > host system ( SUN Enterprise 5220) reconizes the "disks" as each having > 931GB space. So that should be 10+ TB in size total. However when I zpool > them together (using raidz) the zpool status reports 9GB instead of 9TB. > > Does ZFS have problem reporting TB and defaults to GB instead?? Is my pool > really TB in size?? > > I've read in the best practice wiki that splitting them into smaller pools. > Any recommendation on this?? I'm desperate in keepingas much space useable > as possible. > > Thanks --Kenny > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss >
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
