True, but a search for zfs "segmentation fault" returns 500 bugs. It's possible one of those is related to my issue, but it would take all day to find out. If it's not "flaky" or "unstable", I'd like to try upgrading to the newest kernel first, unless my Linux mindset is truly out of place here, or if it's not relatively easy to do. Are these kernels truly considered stable? How would I upgrade? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Segmentation fault / core dump with r... BJ Quinn
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Segmentation fault / core dump w... Richard Elling
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Segmentation fault / core du... BJ Quinn
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Segmentation fault / cor... Richard Elling
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Segmentation fault /... BJ Quinn
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Segmentation fa... Richard Elling
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Segmentation fa... Bob Friesenhahn
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Segmentatio... Joerg Schilling
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Segmentation fa... Fajar A. Nugraha
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Segmentation fault / cor... David G. Bustos
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Segmentation fault /... BJ Quinn
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Segmentation fault /... BJ Quinn
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Segmentation fa... Brent Jones
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Segmentatio... Christian Heßmann
- Re: [zfs-discuss] Segment... BJ Quinn