>>"Francois Dion" wrote: >> Source is local to rsync, copying from a zfs file system, >> destination is remote over a dsl connection. Takes forever to just >> go through the unchanged files. Going the other way is not a >> problem, it takes a fraction of the time. Anybody seen that? >> Suggestions? >De: Blake Irvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Upstream when using DSL is much slower than downstream?
No, that's not the problem. I know ADSL is assymetrical. When there is an actual data transfer going on, the cpu drops to 0.2%. It's only when rsync is doing its thing (reading, not writing) locally that it pegs the cpu. We are talking 15 minutes in one direction while in the other it looks like I'll pass the 24 hours mark before the rsync is complete. And there were less than 100MB added on each side. BTW, the only other process I've seen that pegs the cpu solid for as long as it runs on my v480 is when I downloaded Belenix through a python script (btdownloadheadless).
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
