Lori Alt wrote:
> On 12/02/08 03:21, jan damborsky wrote:
>> Hi Dick,
>>
>> I am redirecting your question to zfs-discuss
>> mailing list, where people are more knowledgeable
>> about this problem and your question could be
>> better answered.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Jan
>>
>>
>> dick hoogendijk wrote:
>>
>>> I have s10u6 installed on my server.
>>> zfs list (partly):
>>> NAME                                    USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT
>>> rpool                                  88.8G   140G  27.5K  /rpool
>>> rpool/ROOT                             20.0G   140G    18K  /rpool/ROOT
>>> rpool/ROOT/s10BE2                      20.0G   140G  7.78G  /
>>>
>>> But just now, on a newly installed s10u6 system I got rpool/ROOT with a
>>> mountpoint "legacy"
>>>
>>>
> The mount point for /<rootpoolname>/ROOT is supposed
> to be "legacy" because that dataset should never be mounted.
> It's just a "container" dataset to group all the BEs.
>
>>> The drives were different. On the latter (legacy) system it was not
>>> formatted (yet) (in VirtualBox). On my server I switched from UFS to
>>> ZFS, so I first created a rpool and than did a luupgrade into it.
>>> This could explain the mountpoint /rpool/ROOT but WHY the difference?
>>> Why can't s10u6 install the same mountpoint on the new disk?
>>> The server runs very well; is this "legacy" thing really needed?
>>>
>>>
> When you created the rpool, did you also explicitly create the rpool/ROOT
> datasets?   If you did create it and didn't set the mount point to
> "legacy",
> that explains why you ended up with your original configuration.  If
> you didn't create the rpool/ROOT dataset yourself, and instead let
> LiveUpgrade
> create it automatically, and LiveUpgrade set the mountpoint to
> /rpool/ROOT, then
> that's a bug in LiveUpgrade (though a minor one, I think).

NO, I'm quite positive all I did was "zfs create rpool" and after that I
did a "lucreate -n zfsBE -p rpool" followed by "luupgrade -u -n zfsBE -s
/iso"

So, it must have been LU that "forgot" to set the mountpoint to legacy.

What is the correct syntax to correct this situation?

-- 
Dick Hoogendijk -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE
+http://nagual.nl/ | SunOS 10u6 10/08 ZFS+

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to