Thanks Tim,
At this moment, I am looking into OpenStorage as NAS (file serving) vs. Linux
NAS (Samba) vs. Win2008 NAS vs. NetApp (ONTAP, not GX) performance.
I am also interested in block-based performance, but not as urgent as above.
(Since 7000 is mainly doing NAS today, in a non-HPC-clustered fashion without
Lustre. With Lustre, the performance competitive focuses are different from
above).
Thanks,
z
----- Original Message -----
From: Tim
To: Joseph Zhou
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] OpenSolaris vs Linux
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Joseph Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi list,
Any one has ANY new data on OpenSolaris vs Linux?
I only found an old post in 2006.
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2006-January/030366.html
And any comments on "if OpenSolaris performance is about the same as
Solaris 10"?
Thanks!
z
That's kind of open ended. What sort of performance are you looking for?
NFS throughput? Software raid? What distro vs. Solaris?
Opensolaris and Solaris are going to have different performance based on what
exactly it is you're testing. Similar is probably accurate for a lot of
things, but not everything.
--Tim
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
