Monish Shah wrote:
Hello everyone,

My understanding is that the ZFS crypto framework will not release until 2010.

That is incorrect information, where did you get that from ?

> In light of that, I'm wondering if the following approach to
encryption could make sense for some subset of users:

The idea is to use the compression framework to do both compression and encryption in one pass. This would be done by defining a new compression type, which might be called "compress-encrypt" or something like that. There could be two levels, one that does both compress and encrypt and another that does encrypt only.

I see the following issues with this approach:

1. ZFS compression framework presently takes compressed data only if there was at least 12.5% reduction. For data that didn't compress, you would wind up storing it unencrypted, even if encryption was on.

2. Meta-data would not be encrypted. I.e., even if you don't have the key, you will be able to do directory listings and see file names, etc.

3.  There is no key management framework.

That is impossible there has to be key management somewhere.

I would deal with these as follows:

Issue #1 can be solved by changing ZFS code such that it always accepts the "compressed" data. I guess this is an easy change.

Issue #2 may be a limitation to some and feature to others.  May be OK.

Issue #3 can be solved using encryption hardware (which my company happens to make). The keys are stored in hardware and can be used directly from that. Of course, this means that the solution will be specific to our hardware, but that's fine by me.

The idea is that we would do this project on our own and supply this modified ZFS with our compression/encryption hardware to our customers. We may submit the patch for inclusion in some future version of OS, if the developers are amenable to that.

If it is specific to your companies hardware I doubt it would ever get integrated into OpenSolaris particularly given the existing zfs-crypto project has no hardware dependencies at all.

The better way to use your encryption hardware is to get it plugged into the OpenSolaris cryptographic framework (see the crypto project on OpenSolaris.org)

Does anyone see any problems with this? There are probably various gotchas here that I haven't thought of. If you can think of any, please let me know.

The various gotchas are the things that have been taking me and the rest of the ZFS team a large part of the zfs-crypto project to resolve. It really isn't as simple as you think it is - if it were then the zfs-crypto project would be done by now!

If you really want to help get encryption for ZFS then please come and join the already existing project rather than starting another one from scratch.

--
Darren J Moffat
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to