On 18-Jun-09, at 12:14 PM, Miles Nordin wrote:
"bmm" == Bogdan M Maryniuk <bogdan.maryn...@gmail.com> writes: "tt" == Toby Thain <t...@telegraphics.com.au> writes:... tt> /. is no person...
... you and I both know it's plausible speculation that Apple delayed unleashing ZFS on their consumers because of the lost pool problems. ZFS doesn't suck, I do use it, I hope and predict it will get better---so just back off and calm down with the rotten fruit. But neither who's saying it nor your not wanting to hear it makes it less plausible.
In my opinion, a more plausible explanation is: Apple has not made ZFS integration a high priority [for 10.6].
There is no doubt Apple has the engineering resources to make it perfectly reliable as a component of Mac OS X, if that were a high priority goal.
I run OS X but I am not at all tempted to play with ZFS on it there; life is too short for betas. If I want ZFS I install Solaris 10.
--Toby
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
