On Sep 2, 2009, at 6:27 AM, Frank Middleton wrote:
On 09/02/09 05:40 AM, Henrik Johansson wrote:
For those of us which have already upgraded and written data to our
raidz pools, are there any risks of inconsistency, wrong checksums in
the pool? Is there a bug id?
This may not be a new problem insofar as it may also affect mirrors.
As part of the ancient "mirrored drives should not have checksum
errors thread", I used Richard Elling's amazing zcksummon script
http://www.richardelling.com/Home/scripts-and-programs-1/zcksummon
to help diagnose this (thanks, Richard, for all your help).
I believe this is a different problem. Adam, was this introduced in
b120?
There is more work that can be leveraged from zcksummon, perhaps
I'll get a few spare moments to test and update the procedure in the
next
few days.
-- richard
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
