David, When you get back to the original system, it would be helpful if you could provide a side-by-side comparison of the zpool create syntax and the zfs list output of both pools.
Thanks, Cindy On 10/01/09 13:48, David Stewart wrote:
Cindy: I am not at the machine right now, but I installed from the OpenSolaris 2009.06 LiveCD and have all of the updates installed. I have solely been using "zfs list" to look at the size of the pools. from a saved file on my laptop: me...@opensolarisnas:~$ zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT mediapool 3.58T 432G 29.9K /mediapool I destroyed the zpool and created another one, this time using "raidz" instead of "raidz1" in the zpool create command, and showed 0 used and 5.3T available. I am happy to have the extra TB of space, but just wanted to make sure that I had performed the create correctly each time. When I created a RAIDZ pool in VMWare Fusion and typed "raidz" instead of "raidz1" I came up with equal sized pools, but that was a virtual machine and only 2GB disks were used. David
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
