On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 12:07:03AM +0100, Jeroen Roodhart wrote: > We are under the impression that a setup that server NFS over UFS has > the same assurance level than a setup using "ZFS without ZIL". Is this > impression false?
Completely. It's closer to "UFS mount -o async", without the risk of UFS corruption, but still with the risk of client-side corruption of the NFS write semantics. -- Dan.
pgpDoytlEmnjP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
