----- "Edward Ned Harvey" <solar...@nedharvey.com> skrev: > > What build were you running? The should have been addressed by > > CR6844090 > > that went into build 117. > > I'm running solaris, but that's irrelevant. The storagetek array > controller > itself reports the new disk as infinitesimally smaller than the one > which I > want to mirror. Even before the drive is given to the OS, that's the > way it > is. Sun X4275 server. > > BTW, I'm still degraded. Haven't found an answer yet, and am > considering > breaking all my mirrors, to create a new pool on the freed disks, and > using > partitions in those disks, for the sake of rebuilding my pool using > partitions on all disks. The aforementioned performance problem is > not as > scary to me as running in degraded redundancy.
I would return the drive to get a bigger one before doing something as drastic as that. There might have been a hichup in the production line, and that's not your fault. roy _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
