Hi Eric,
> Problem is the OP is mixing client 4k drives with 512b drives.
How do you come to that assesment?
Here's what I have:
Ap_Id Information
sata1/1::dsk/c7t1d0 Mod: WDC WD10EADS-00L5B1 FRev: 01.01A01
sata1/2::dsk/c7t2d0 Mod: WDC WD10EADS-00P8B0 FRev: 01.00A01
sata1/3::dsk/c7t3d0 Mod: WDC WD10EADS-00P8B0 FRev: 01.00A01
sata1/4::dsk/c7t4d0 Mod: WDC WD10EADS-00P8B0 FRev: 01.00A01
sata1/5::dsk/c7t5d0 Mod: WDC WD10EADS-00P8B0 FRev: 01.00A01
sata2/1::dsk/c0t1d0 Mod: WDC WD10EADS-00P8B0 FRev: 01.00A01
They all seem to indicate the older 512b from the WDC site unless I'm not
understanding their spec sheets.
> I doubt they're "broken" per say, they're just dramatically slower
> than their peers in this workload.
It does make sense though! My read speed (trying to copy 683Gb across to
another machine) is roughly 7-8Mbps where I used to get on average 30-40Mbps.
> As a replacement recommendation, we've been beating on the WD 1TB RE3
Cool, either the RE3 or black drives it is :-)
Thanks,
Em
_________________________________________________________________
View photos of singles in your area! Looking for a hot date?
http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/150855801/direct/01/_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
