----- "Travis Tabbal" <tra...@tabbal.net> skrev: > Disable ZIL and test again. NFS does a lot of sync writes and kills > performance. Disabling ZIL (or using the synchronicity option if a > build with that ever comes out) will prevent that behavior, and should > get your NFS performance close to local. It's up to you if you want to > leave it that way. There are reasons not to as well. NFS clients can > get corrupted views of the filesystem should the server go down before > a write flush is completed. ZIL prevents that problem. In my case, the > clients aren't on a UPS while the server is, so it's not an issue. :)
Disabling ZIL is, according to ZFS best practice, NOT recommended. Get some SSD for the Zil instead, preferably mirrored. You won't need a lot, ZIL never uses more than half the RAM size Vennlige hilsener / Best regards roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (+47) 97542685 r...@karlsbakk.net http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ -- I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
