On Jun 10, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Richard Elling <richard.ell...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Jun 10, 2010, at 1:24 PM, Arne Jansen wrote:
Andrey Kuzmin wrote:
Well, I'm more accustomed to "sequential vs. random", but YMMW.
As to 67000 512 byte writes (this sounds suspiciously close to
32Mb fitting into cache), did you have write-back enabled?
It's a sustained number, so it shouldn't matter.
That is only 34 MB/sec. The disk can do better for sequential writes.
Not doing sector sized IO.
Besides this was a max IOPS number not max throughput number. If it
were the OP might have used a 1M bs or better instead.
-Ross
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
