'Edward Ned Harvey' wrote:
From: Henrik Johansen [mailto:hen...@scannet.dk]
The 10g models are stable - especially the R905's are real workhorses.
You would generally consider all your machines stable now?
Can you easily pdsh to all those machines?
Yes - the only problem child has been 1 R610 (the other 2 that we have
in production have not shown any signs of trouble)
kstat | grep current_cstate ; kstat | grep supported_max_cstates
I'd really love to see if "some current_cstate is higher than
supported_max_cstates" is an accurate indicator of system instability.
Here's a little sample from different machines :
R610 #1
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 0
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
R610 #2
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 0
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
current_cstate 3
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
supported_max_cstates 2
PE2900
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 0
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 0
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 1
supported_max_cstates 1
supported_max_cstates 1
supported_max_cstates 1
supported_max_cstates 1
supported_max_cstates 1
supported_max_cstates 1
supported_max_cstates 1
supported_max_cstates 1
PER905
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 0
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 0
current_cstate 1
current_cstate 1
supported_max_cstates 0
supported_max_cstates 0
supported_max_cstates 0
supported_max_cstates 0
supported_max_cstates 0
supported_max_cstates 0
supported_max_cstates 0
supported_max_cstates 0
supported_max_cstates 0
supported_max_cstates 0
supported_max_cstates 0
supported_max_cstates 0
supported_max_cstates 0
supported_max_cstates 0
supported_max_cstates 0
supported_max_cstates 0
The PE2900 and R905 that I took the data from have uptimes close to 1
year and see a LOT of usage.
So far the two data points I have support this theory.
--
Med venlig hilsen / Best Regards
Henrik Johansen
hen...@scannet.dk
Tlf. 75 53 35 00
ScanNet Group
A/S ScanNet
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
