> How about comparing a non-battery backed ZIL to running a > ZFS dataset with sync=disabled. Which is more risky?
Most likely, the 3.5" SSD's on-board volatile (not power protected) memory would be small relative to the transaction group (txg) size and thus less "risky" than sync=disabled. Best regards, Christopher George Founder/CTO www.ddrdrive.com -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
