Hi all I have about 350TB on ZFS now, and with an old box with WD Greens (those getting replaced as of now), I've had very little drive failures. iostat -en shows a minimum of errors, and all is well.
Then, the new 100TB setups are based on FASS drives (2TB WD Blacks). Those seem to be rather worse in the terms of expected age. We've replaced seven so far, out of 158 in total, so it's not that bad, but even the newer ones seem to show high error rates. Some of the drives that have been returned, have shown no errors with WD's tools. So, does anyone know which drives to choose for the next setup? Hitachis look good so far, perhaps also seagates, but right now, I'm dubious about the blacks. Vennlige hilsener / Best regards roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (+47) 97542685 r...@karlsbakk.net http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ -- I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk. _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
