On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <r...@karlsbakk.net> wrote: > This was fletcher4 earlier, and still is in opensolaris/openindiana. Given a > combination with verify (which I would use anyway, since there are always > tiny chances of collisions), why would sha256 be a better choice?
fletcher4 was only an option for snv_128, which was quickly pulled and replaced with snv_128b which removed fletcher4 as an option. The official post is here: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=118519&tstart=0#437431 It looks like fletcher4 is still an option in snv_151a for non-dedup datasets, and is in fact the default. As an aside: Erik, any idea when the 159 bits will make it to the public? -B -- Brandon High : bh...@freaks.com _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
