On 2011-May-25 03:49:43 +0800, Brandon High <bh...@freaks.com> wrote: >... unless Oracle's zpool v30 is different than Nexenta's v30.
This would be unfortunate but no worse than the current situation with UFS - Solaris, *BSD and HP Tru64 all have native UFS filesystems, all of which are incompatible. I believe the various OSS projects that use ZFS have formed a working group to co-ordinate ZFS amongst themselves. I don't know if Oracle was invited to join (though given the way Oracle has behaved in all the other OSS working groups it was a member of, having Oracle onboard might be a disadvantage). -- Peter Jeremy _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
