On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha <w...@fajar.net> wrote: >> >> I have ever not seen any issues until I did a comparison with Linux. > > So basically you're comparing linux + ext3/4 performance with solaris > + zfs, on the same hardware? That's not really fair, is it? > If your load is I/O-intensive enough, ext3/4 will easily win since it > doesn't have to do things like calculating checksum. > > Now if you compare it to .. say ... btrfs, or zfsonlinux, it'd be more > in the same ballpark. >
I'll be more comfortable if I didn't see the lock contention, are you indicating this(every file vnode access will acquire the same root mutex) is normal? I think it will be good if calculating checksum consumes CPU. Thanks, -Aubrey _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
