http://wesunsolve.net/bugid/id/6563887 -- richard
On Apr 14, 2012, at 6:04 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss- >> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Freddie Cash >> >> I thought ZFSv20-something added a "if the blockcount is within 10%, >> then allow the replace to succeed" feature, to work around this issue? > > About 2 yrs ago, I replaced a drive with 1 block less, and it was a big > problem. This was a drive bought from oracle, to replace an oracle drive, on > a supported sun system, and it was the same model drive, with a higher > firmware rev. We worked on it extensively, eventually managed to shoe-horn > the drive in there, and I pledged I would always partition drives slightly > smaller from now on. > > Then, about 2 weeks later, the support rep emailed me to say they implemented > a new feature, which could autoresize +/- some small percentage difference, > like 1Mb difference or something like that. > > So there is some solid reason to corroborate Freddie's suspicion, but there's > no way I'm going to find any material to reference now. The timing even > sounds about right to support the v20 idea. I haven't tested or proven it > myself, but I am confidently assuming moving forward, that small variations > will be handled gracefully. > > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss -- ZFS Performance and Training richard.ell...@richardelling.com +1-760-896-4422
_______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
