Jim Cobabe wrote:

> Not really anything new here.  Just more evil detractors continuing the
> attempt to dilute and de-emphasise sacred doctrines of the Church, so
> that it becomes indistinguishable from other corrupt sects.  It is

Not to disagree with you in principle, but just to pick a nit: it's the "so-called
intellectual" crowd, and I quote Pres. Packer on this deliberately, for there are
people -- and I count myself amongst them -- who are quite able to accept the
details of secular history but put them into their proper perspective and not miss
the forest for the trees. We have a cultural problem here, and this time it is not
US vs. everyone else, as I suspect some here see my worldview as bifurcating ;-)
but rather a modern west liberal democratic intellectual tradition which is
neo-hellenistic, versus sacred history, which is semitic in nature. The
neo-hellenistic approach is analytical, which means to tease apart concepts for
their constituent meanings, whereas what I call the semitic approach is synthetic,
which means to see out of the parts a whole that is greater than the sum of the
parts. Some of us appreciate art, so to speak, and others specialize in jig-saw
puzzles. The so-called New Mormon historians are jig-saw puzzle addicts. I prefer
art, myself.

>
> becoming quite respectable in the intellectual crowd to maintain that
> the Book of Mormon has origins in the 19th century, was somehow composed
> and fabricated by Joseph Smith, and is not the historical record it
> claims to be.  This particular school of self-appointed apologists argue
> that it doesn't make any difference to their religious understanding,
> since, like the Bible, the story is simply figurative.
>

"Simply figurate" is not really their error, in my opinion. There are meanings in
scripture which are difficult to get at which transcend a literalistic reading.
Ironically, that is what the new historians do: they read a sacred history as if
it were a secular history, and in doing so they destroy the thing they profess to
study.

>

[and again, I emphasize, I am not arguing your point; I am trying to bolster it
and to enlarge upon it]


--
Marc A. Schindler
Spruce Grove, Alberta, Canada -- Gateway to the Boreal Parkland

“Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he will pick
himself up and continue on” – Winston Churchill

Note: This communication represents the informal personal views of the author
solely; its contents do not necessarily reflect those of the author’s employer,
nor those of any organization with which the author may be associated.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
///  ZION LIST CHARTER: Please read it at  ///
///  http://www.zionsbest.com/charter.html      ///
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

==^^===============================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?aaP9AU.bWix1n.YXJjaGl2
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^^===============================================================

Reply via email to