Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > Hi Jens,
> IMHO the licensing issue is of general interest beyond this one > software bit. If there are any changes to Plone licensing I'm sure > people on this list would be happy if you or someone else could > provide some summary, if and when something is being changed :-) > Some people including Wichert and Martin are pushing the Plone foundation to allow for an alternative license for Plone packages that are more of a underlying "framework/library nature" on request. As I see it, chances are good that we'll see this changing within the next few month even. At the moment, the discussion is about whether we (the Plone foundation) should generally allow one or several alternative licenses (-> one seems to be the current favorite) and whether this one (if so decided) should be LGPL or BSD(-like). If there would be a strong preference from the CMF community here I'm sure this would be honored in our discussion. Opinions anyone? (ideally including a reasoning beyond "I want ZPL because that's what Zope itself uses") ;-) Raphael > jens > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkm2GO0ACgkQRAx5nvEhZLJs9gCgo69+c0mzg4rIjDSO+h2DEUM1 > H90AoIEzoTI2kkYlTq/dX483KZFsFBnc > =8P7y > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf > > See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests > _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests