-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On Mar 10, 2009, at 09:14 , Raphael Ritz wrote: > Opinions anyone? (ideally including a reasoning beyond > "I want ZPL because that's what Zope itself uses") ;-) In general, commercial adoption of a software stack is made easier if it is not accompanied by a whole soup of different licenses. The fewer licenses, the better. I'm sure that issue is on your radar already. As you know, all code you'd like pushed down the stack into the CMF or Zope must be licensed under the ZPL. That's also a prerequisite for being stored in the Zope Foundation repositories (a.k.a. svn.zope.org). In the end I hope that whatever decision is being made does not serve to widen the distance between the Plone community and the rest of the Zope universe. jens -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkm2JqkACgkQRAx5nvEhZLJNMACeJvlVOK8y1hxx5dkyP1pmwP/M fqAAoJXXclf5a7Gy0tDiAhH5db0oCJLU =mIFf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
