On Tuesday 13 April 2004 22:17, Tres Seaver wrote: > <snip> > > >>Of course, having two packages with names differing only in case is a > >>bit ugly. > >> > >>Do we want to consider renaming one or both of these packages > >>to avoid the conflict? > > -1 to renaming 'Zope'; the amount of third-party code which we would > break is incalculable. -0 to renaming 'zope' to 'z3', or something; at > least third party code for Zope3 was built in the test-driven culture, > and has at least some chance of migrating cleanly with confidence.
You wanna rename 'zope' to 'z3' for the purpose of merging the two? I really hope that will not be the case. Or is this for Zope 2 only? I would hate to have imports like "z3.app.foo" or even "z3.i18n". I am definitely -1 on this option, if it also applies to standalone Zope 3. Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )