On Thursday 19 January 2006 07:00, Jim Fulton wrote: > > I have seen you take a similar approach to zope.testing and I found that > > painful just by watching the checkins. > > I don't understand what you mean. Having a separate zope.testing project > has been extremely useful. For example, in our comercial apps, > we often used newer versions than existed in Zope 3. We often needed > enhacements to zope.testing at times that Zope 3 was feature frozen. > We could have made a Zope 3 branch just to modify zope.testing, but that > would have been a hassle for us and for Zope 3 developers. Note that > the new test runner (from zope.testing) was used in ZODB long before it > was used in Zope 3.
Argument taken and agreed that this is a valuable use case. Regard, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student) Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )