On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the cases where projects (like Zope 3, Zope 2, CMF and ZODB) don't have > their own sites, we give them space to maintain some documentation and basic > information.
That story is better than the original formulation. >> Exactly. Whch is very differnt from the previous idea of creating a >> fixed structure for all projects with documentation etc. > That was never the idea. OK. It sounded like it. > I'm not terribly worried about upgrades. At least not now. The new zope.org > site runs a very plain Plone instance. It has one purpose: to present some > content. I don't want it littered with weird stuff that is hard to migrate > or update. It is true that the collector is no more, which helps. -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting. http://www.colliberty.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
