Roger, you make excellent sense here. The other issue of course is the testing setup. So there is potential to operate here on a few levels to achieve something that makes much better sense for moving forward.
Roger Ineichen wrote: > I think the cleanup isn't really needed for zope packages itself. > It's more a question how other can reuse small parts of our > component architecture without to load everything. > > My personal meaning is, we already have a component architecture > but we need to split it in a different way into reusable components. > Such a split could probably not be done earlier because we didn't > see all the usecases. But now since we have grok, repoze and z3c > we have many more options to reuse other components and this makes > it much clearer what we have to provide as reusable and what not. > > Regards > Roger Ineichen > >> -aj > > _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )