Fred Drake wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I can't see any problems with this, can anyone else?
>
> There's the backward-compatibility issue, which is a showstopper.
> There's plenty of code that does this:
>
> adapter = package.interfaces.IFoo(object, None)
>
> Changing the signature as you describe would break all code that does this.
How about a new major revision of zope.interface then?
I thought the pointless yoke of backwards compatability was something
only Microsoft yearned for? ;-)
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
