Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: >> >> So overall I'm +1 > > +1 from me as well on IFoo.adapt() with the signature Chris suggested. > "zope.component.getMultiAdapter()" is only easy to remember if you're a > die-hard Zope coder, while IFoo.adapt() seems more useful to the larger > Python community.
A similar suggestion was hammered out last September; I guess September is the official month for the annual reconsideration of adaptation syntax? :-) http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2007-September/023824.html http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2007-September/023904.html http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/2007-September/023907.html I'm encouraged by the fact that this time it looks like people with time are interested enough to actually begin producing code? At the time that I made the 2007 proposal I was still very new to the code base and never got the courage up (or time available) to start making changes... -- Brandon Craig Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://rhodesmill.org/brandon _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
