On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman <janwijbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/17/13 1:47 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: >> >> I strongly prefer that the reviewer do the merge. >> >> I'd also really like reviewers to take their responsibility >> seriously, making comments and suggestions where appropriate. >> >> Software review, done well, improves the software, and, more >> importantly, improves the developers. > > > I agree - I know I get better from recieving feedback :-) > > Is this "reviewer role" something someone takes upon himself? I mean, if I > see a pull request for a code base that I know, I could review the request?
These are good questions. I probably don't have satisfying answers. The short answer is that I think people who contribute to a project should view review as one of their duties. For better or worse, this is somewhat informal. If you don't get a review in a timely manner, try posting to the appropriate mailing list to request a review. > Or do we acknowledge a group of people that generally do reviews (again > formally of informally, I don't mind, I'm not looking for "official > procedures")? No. > p.s. Another thing I noticed: some of the discussion about changes and > patches and fixes now shift from the mailinglist to github. This is fine, I > guess. Yes, IMO. Jim -- Jim Fulton http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
